Proposal to Adopt the Chicago Principles of Solidarity

[marymcmahon@clear.net]

MxThanks, got it. That clears everything up. ED1 began with the impression that this could be modified when he said that he suggested we accept this as is.

I think sometimes committee members loose perspective on who knows what. And definitely here on forums questions should be received in context of what the general public knows about the subject being discussed.

Thank you.

[m_x]

Happy I could clarify.

Now please just use peoples screen name/handle stop referring to us by our names.

Had we wanted to do so we would use our names or go by the ones you've given us but we chose not to.

[education01]

Mary:
I've asked you and everyone else politely: STOP USING MY NAME. DON'T use my initials. DON'T call me by my first initial. I have a screen name. Either use that, or just refer to me as the 'author of this proposal'. How hard is this?

Evelyn: I need you to please edit your first post. This goes for anyone else who used first names in here.

[marymcmahon@clear.net]

Well, since you asked so nicely, I will boys.
And if you could put in a word so I could EDIT my accont here I would be ever so grateful.

[education01]

Mary: For some reason the timeout on the website is like 20 seconds, I'm not sure why that is, and it's quite annoying. As long as you're signed in, every post you've made should have an "edit" box at the top. Please go back and delete my name and my initials from all the posts you used it in, and replace it with my screen name.

Thanks.

[Bunny]

The principles were signed months ago by other organizations that have been working hard to organize for the summits. We're behind, which is why I love Mr. 01's initiative in getting OC on board.

This isn't being rushed and there are no edits to be made. We have to decide if we are going to be united with the other groups or not. It's my opinion that we should be.

[marymcmahon@clear.net]

Bunny, a simple response to my first post could of set me straight this A.M. So maybe when someone in forums refers back to their another post, readers might assume there is something germane there and check it out, rather than assuming someone is picking a fight or doesn't deserve an answer. It's like everyone is suffering from PTSD around here sometimes!

[myanswer]

WTF is this about "limiting our action to “free speech zones,” what is a "free speech zone" How do I know if I am in one? Am I supposed to B mute outside of one and if I open my mouth outside of one am I subject to arrest? I think our objections are missing the point that this is a severe attack on our 1st amendment rights of freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom to redress grievances, and freedom from search! It's the hidden agenda here that I oppose

[radio]

I find issue with the "free speech zone", like many others. We're just boxing ourselves in. We are simply using their terms and conditions against ourselves, isn't this apparent?
That's pretty much all I have to say on this.

[Bunny]

The language OPPOSES limiting ourselves to free speech zones.

Mary, your question was answered many times while you continued childishly with the **** names.

Reading comprehension FTW.